On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> If I didn't have any release blockers, I'd schedule 3.5.1 for sometime
> around three weeks from now. And FYI I want to release 3.4.4 about two
> weeks after that.
>
Thanks Larry! That'd be awesome. If there's testing needed on that
ticket,
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:51:05 -0800, Larry Hastings writes:
>
>
>On 11/01/2015 09:10 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
>> Put that on python.org as soon as possible.
>> even if you need to bump the python 3.5 numbering.
>> you get 3.5.1 for this, and this alone and everybody else gets to
>> wa
On 11/01/2015 09:10 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
Put that on python.org as soon as possible.
even if you need to bump the python 3.5 numbering.
you get 3.5.1 for this, and this alone and everybody else gets to
wait for 3.5.2 and when Larry feels this is a good idea.
Well, let me say this. I ha
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 08:23:48 -0800, Steve Dower writes:
>"The initial rush of bug reports I see has not gone down. It's been in steady
>increase."
>
>To clarify, I meant unique bugs. When my job is to fix them, more reports of
>the same bug are not important to me, especially once t
inal Message-
From: "Laura Creighton"
Sent: 11/1/2015 6:22
To: "Steve Dower"
Cc: "Chris Angelico" ; "Phil Thompson"
; "python-dev" ;
"l...@openend.se"
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3.5.1 plans
In a message of Sun, 01
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 05:52:40 -0800, Steve Dower writes:
>The installer and the contained contents are currently tied together, making
>it fairly difficult to mix and match versions.
>
>When 3.5.1 happens is up to Larry, but I'm feeling like the initial rush of
>bug reports has died d
Phone
-Original Message-
From: "Chris Angelico"
Sent: 11/1/2015 3:03
To: "Phil Thompson"
Cc: "python-dev"
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3.5.1 plans
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Phil Thompson
wrote:
> On 1 Nov 2015, at 10:30 a.m., Chris Ange
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Phil Thompson
wrote:
> On 1 Nov 2015, at 10:30 a.m., Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> PEP 478 [1] doesn't currently have any info on a planned 3.5.1 release
>> (and actually, it has 3.5.0 Final listed as a future release). About
>> when is it likely to happen? The one t
On 1 Nov 2015, at 10:30 a.m., Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> PEP 478 [1] doesn't currently have any info on a planned 3.5.1 release
> (and actually, it has 3.5.0 Final listed as a future release). About
> when is it likely to happen? The one thing I'm hanging out for is an
> installer patch on Windows
PEP 478 [1] doesn't currently have any info on a planned 3.5.1 release
(and actually, it has 3.5.0 Final listed as a future release). About
when is it likely to happen? The one thing I'm hanging out for is an
installer patch on Windows that detects XP and immediately aborts with
a convenient error;
10 matches
Mail list logo
