>> (*) Remember, however, that Tarek and work on Distribute, and also on
>> bringing pieces of setuptools/Distribute functionality into distutils.
>
> But if that's the case then why not work on any third party tool..? like
> pip or setuptools?
>
> It seems are very longwinded process if the only w
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:20:03 + (UTC), Antoine Pitrou
wrote:
> (*) Remember, however, that Tarek and work on Distribute, and also on
> bringing pieces of setuptools/Distribute functionality into distutils.
But if that's the case then why not work on any third party tool..? like
pip or setupto
Glenn Linderman g.nevcal.com> writes:
>
> Maybe what David is missing is that since python-dev is uninterested in
> the package management issue, [...]
It's a bit strong to say we are uninterested. Most of us are not interested
enough to tackle it ourselves (*), but we are certainly interested
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:35:49PM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> Maybe what David is missing is that since python-dev is uninterested in
> the package management issue, the only remaining way to include package
> management in a convenient, single installation, is to
>
> 1) Create the package
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:34:24PM -0400, David Lyon wrote:
> I started out some time ago and wrote a Python Package Manager
> with wxpython.
David, your message appeared in the middle of another thread. Please
don't use "Reply" button to start a new thread - send a new message.
Oleg.
--
David Lyon writes:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:38:26 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > David, you are making a huge leap here thinking that we even want
> > a package manager in the stdlib.
>
> Well - who is 'we'? If it's python-dev people I can accept and
> respect that.
Yes. The stdlib is a
On approximately 10/21/2009 7:13 PM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of David Lyon:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:38:26 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
We make a language here. Distutils exists as a bootstrap
mechanism for the package story and for our own building needs of the
stdlib.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:38:26 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> But that assumes you can get your tool into the stdlib.
No I'm not assuming that I can. I am actually assuming that I cannot..
So lets move forward..
> It would have been
> better to phrase the question as "is there interest in having a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 18:17, David Lyon wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:57 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > but I don't see why python-dev should have input on that sort of thing.
>
> python-dev is the only place where we could get a change to the
> installation
> binary release. We'd need
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:57 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> but I don't see why python-dev should have input on that sort of thing.
python-dev is the only place where we could get a change to the
installation
binary release. We'd need a change and the addition of a program
shortcut.
> If you want
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 17:34, David Lyon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I started out some time ago and wrote a Python Package Manager
> with wxpython. It was an interesting learning experience for
> me. I was new to python.
>
> Some have pointed out that using wx was not a good idea for
> a tool to go
Hi All,
I started out some time ago and wrote a Python Package Manager
with wxpython. It was an interesting learning experience for
me. I was new to python.
Some have pointed out that using wx was not a good idea for
a tool to go into all the python distributions. Because it
required the externa
12 matches
Mail list logo
