Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On Thursday 19 January 2006 08:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Maybe I misread the directions. I thought I had to install some
>>new library I'd never heard of (syck), Python bindings for the
>>same, and maybe some other stuff. It clearly wasn't just "svn co
>>..." and s
On Thursday 19 January 2006 08:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe I misread the directions. I thought I had to install some
> new library I'd never heard of (syck), Python bindings for the
> same, and maybe some other stuff. It clearly wasn't just "svn co
> ..." and start editing. In any case,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> My first attempt ended almost immediately. Too much software to
> download
> >> and install for anything like casual use.
>
> Tim> For casual use why not just edit the rest file?
>
> Maybe I misread the directions. I thought I had to install some new l
>> My first attempt ended almost immediately. Too much software to download
>> and install for anything like casual use.
Tim> For casual use why not just edit the rest file?
Maybe I misread the directions. I thought I had to install some new library
I'd never heard of (syck), Pytho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Steve> We should also add script explaining how to download the beta
>Steve> site data and the generation software so people can play with it
>Steve> and get ready to be webmasters :-)
>
>My first attempt ended almost immediately. Too much software to downloa
Steve> We should also add script explaining how to download the beta
Steve> site data and the generation software so people can play with it
Steve> and get ready to be webmasters :-)
My first attempt ended almost immediately. Too much software to download
and install for anything lik
Steve Holden wrote:
>Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Georg> Interesting, didn't even know a new page was in the making... Do
>>> Georg> you know who is responsible for the new page?
>>>
>>>Tim Parkin is heading things up. Look here:
>>>
>>> http://beta
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Georg> Interesting, didn't even know a new page was in the making... Do
>>Georg> you know who is responsible for the new page?
>>
>>Tim Parkin is heading things up. Look here:
>>
>>http://beta.python.org/
>
>
> I like the look of t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Georg> Interesting, didn't even know a new page was in the making... Do
> Georg> you know who is responsible for the new page?
>
> Tim Parkin is heading things up. Look here:
>
> http://beta.python.org/
I like the look of the new page, but it took a bit o
Georg> Interesting, didn't even know a new page was in the making... Do
Georg> you know who is responsible for the new page?
Tim Parkin is heading things up. Look here:
http://beta.python.org/
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> does Python have an official icon?
>
> Ping> i found some images at http://www.pythonology.com/logos...
>
> It appears the yin/yang Python's on that page are being used in the new site
> (beta.python.org). I don't know if that makes it official or not though
>> does Python have an official icon?
Ping> i found some images at http://www.pythonology.com/logos...
It appears the yin/yang Python's on that page are being used in the new site
(beta.python.org). I don't know if that makes it official or not though.
Skip
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Georg Brandl wrote:
> does Python have an official icon? Not py.ico from PC/, that's a bit
> ugly and does not scale. Has no designerhead ever done such a thing?
There have been a couple of proposed logos -- i found some images
at http://www.pythonology.com/logos -- but i don'
Hi,
does Python have an official icon? Not py.ico from PC/, that's a bit
ugly and does not scale. Has no designerhead ever done such a thing?
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Uns
14 matches
Mail list logo
