Re: [Python-Dev] Python on non IEEE-754 platforms: plea for information.

2008-02-02 Thread Christian Heimes
Mark Dickinson wrote: Thank you: a very useful thread. From what little information I'm turning up on Google, it looks as though most of these devices---if they support floating-point at all---provide some reasonably close approximation to IEEE 754 floats (possibly emulated in software).

[Python-Dev] Python on non IEEE-754 platforms: plea for information.

2008-02-01 Thread Mark Dickinson
A request for information: What non IEEE 754 platforms exist that people care about running Python 2.6, Python 3.0 and higher on? By non IEEE 754 platform, I mean a platform where either the C double is not the usual 64-bit IEEE floating-point format, or where the C double is IEEE format but the

Re: [Python-Dev] Python on non IEEE-754 platforms: plea for information.

2008-02-01 Thread Neal Norwitz
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The IBM format is particularly troublesome because it's base 16 instead of base 2 (so e.g. multiplying a float by 2 can lose bits), but it appears that recent IBM machines do both IBM format and IEEE format floating-point. I

Re: [Python-Dev] Python on non IEEE-754 platforms: plea for information.

2008-02-01 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Feb 1, 2008 8:04 PM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I spoke to Mikko Ohtamaa (Moo-- on #pys60) and he gave me the name of a Nokia developer and this link http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97263. I already contacted the developer and asked him to reply