Hi Tim,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 05:21:29PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> > we reverted to repr/eval, which is quite slower (and actually not
> > guaranteed to
> > work across Python versions either: string escapes sometimes change).
>
> Really? The precise rules str's __repr__ uses for which escap
[Armin Rigo]
> Some code in the 'py' lib used to use marshal to send simple objects between
> the main process and a subprocess. We ran into trouble when we extended the
> idea to a subprocess that would actually run via ssh on a remote machine, and
> the remote machine's Python version didn't mat
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> Thanks for those suggestions.
> Let's see what I can concoct.
>
> Never made (or studied in detail) a python regression test case
> before so now is a good time :)
You might be especially interested in 'class urlopen_HttpTests' in
t
Tim Delaney wrote:
Irmen de Jong wrote:
Also, I'm not sure how a test-case should be constructed
for this patch? Can the Python regression test download stuff
as part of a test? Or is there some other way to make a
testcase for this.
Hmm - perhaps start a server on the local machine at the start o
Armin Rigo wrote:
> Some code in the 'py' lib used to use marshal to send simple objects between
> the main process and a subprocess. We ran into trouble when we extended the
> idea to a subprocess that would actually run via ssh on a remote machine, and
> the remote machine's Python version didn
Hi Tim,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 07:26:25PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> Still, it's a new-in-2.4 gimmick, and no pre-2.4 code could be using
> it. I suppose Armin found a use for it in 2.4, but I'm still
> scratching my head. If ZODB doesn't already depend on it, how useful
> can it be? QED
Some
[Jeremy Hylton on a quick 2.4.1]
>>> Nothing wrong with an incremental release, but none of these sound
>>> like critical bugs to me.
[Aahz]
>> You don't think a blowup in marshal is critical? Mind expanding on
>> that?
[Jeremy]
> An undocumented extension to marshal causes a segfault. It's
> c
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:25:39 -0500, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:03:13 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:48, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 woul
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:03:13 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:48, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
>>
>> +1
>
> Nothing wrong with an incremental release, but
Irmen de Jong wrote:
Also, I'm not sure how a test-case should be constructed
for this patch? Can the Python regression test download stuff
as part of a test? Or is there some other way to make a
testcase for this.
Hmm - perhaps start a server on the local machine at the start of the test,
and tea
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
* Fix for off-by-one bug in urllib.URLopener.retrieve
http://www.python.org/sf/810023
(assigned to me)
Is http://www.python.org/sf/1062060 perhaps of similar importance?
(fix for urllib.urlretrieve silently truncating download)
That seems reasonable to me. There is n
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
> >
> > Ideally, it should include other important fixes:
> [...]
> > * Fix for off-by-one bug in urllib.URLopener.retrieve
> >http://www.python.org/sf/810023
> >(assigned to me)
>
> Is http://www.python.org/s
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
Ideally, it should include other important fixes:
[...]
* Fix for off-by-one bug in urllib.URLopener.retrieve
http://www.python.org/sf/810023
(assigned to me)
Is http://www.python.org/sf/1062060 perhaps of similar im
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:03:13 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:48, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> > Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
>
> +1
Nothing wrong with an incremental release, but none of these sound
like critical bugs to me.
Jeremy
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:48, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
+1
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.o
[Armin]
> Crash. Which means that there is no way in 2.4.0 to marshal an object
in the
> > old version format as a string -- you'd have to work around by
writing a real
> > file and reading it back :-(
[Aahz]
> Brown bag time?
Perhaps a rather quick Py2.4.1 would be in order.
Ideally, it shoul
16 matches
Mail list logo
