On 06. 06. 22 20:05, Steve Dower wrote:
+1. Glad it's not just me
On 6/6/2022 2:36 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
First, I understood that "Arbitrary Literal String Type" was adding a
new built-in types for "literal strings" :-) Nope. It's just about
type annotations ;-)
I was also excited
> or has at least agreed to, not sure any releases have happened since I
asked).
I did:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3110b3/#:~:text=3.11.0b3%20is%20the%20second,support%20the%20new%20feature%20release
.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 19:13, Steve Dower wrote:
> +1. Glad it's not
+1. Glad it's not just me
On 6/6/2022 2:36 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
First, I understood that "Arbitrary Literal String Type" was adding a
new built-in types for "literal strings" :-) Nope. It's just about
type annotations ;-)
I was also excited about the new built-in type :-)
Pablo is
Hi,
Side note: it would be nice to add "typing: " prefix or mention "type
annotation" or "type check" in the title of PEPs which are about that.
Just from the PEP title, it's hard *for me* to guess that it's about
type annotations.
Examples of other PEP titles which confused me:
PEP 612 –
