[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)

2021-07-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 07. 21 5:21, Ethan Furman wrote: On 7/11/21 4:00 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: >> I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were >> integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag.  As a result the

[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)

2021-07-12 Thread Ethan Furman
On 7/11/21 4:00 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: >> I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were >> integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag. As a result the enum in 3.10 will be the same >> as 3.9

[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)

2021-07-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: On 6/29/21 9:50 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > the Steering Council strongly suggests that for Python 3.10, the changes in Enum’s > str and repr be reverted back to the Python 3.9 behavior, and that a PEP be written > for Python 3.11. I was unable to

[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)

2021-07-06 Thread Ethan Furman
On 6/29/21 9:50 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > the Steering Council strongly suggests that for Python 3.10, the changes in Enum’s > str and repr be reverted back to the Python 3.9 behavior, and that a PEP be written > for Python 3.11. I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the