> Even less, actually.
> The PEP doesn't make a very clear distinction between invalid Python
> syntax vs. invalid type annotation, so I wanted to check if we're on the
> same page here: the newly valid syntax will be subject to PEP 387.
> We clearly are on the same page, and I don't think you
On 13. 01. 22 16:23, Matthew Rahtz wrote:
Thanks for this feedback, Petr!
*First point (indexing assignment)*
Great catch; we hadn't thought about this. I agree it would be better to
keep these in sync.
I just tested this in our current CPython implementation, and can
confirm it looks like
