Hi Mark,
Le 05/03/2021 à 18:06, Mark Shannon a écrit :
Hi Antoine,
On 05/03/2021 4:07 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:03:59 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
There are two issues here. Portability and changes to behaviour.
Regarding portability, I have to admit that PEP is rather
Hi Antoine,
On 05/03/2021 4:07 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:03:59 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
There are two issues here. Portability and changes to behaviour.
Regarding portability, I have to admit that PEP is rather vague.
That's my fault; I should have done more
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:03:59 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> There are two issues here. Portability and changes to behaviour.
>
> Regarding portability, I have to admit that PEP is rather vague.
> That's my fault; I should have done more implementation first :(
> FWIW, I have an implementation
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to consider the PEP.
Although the PEP was rejected, I still believe that the safety
guarantees in PEP 651 are worth adding to Python in the future.
To do that (maybe for 3.11), I need to understand your concerns better.
Would you clarify a few points for me?
