On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Simon Cross
wrote:
> This might be tricky for alternative Python implementations which
> might compile regular expressions into something rather different.
As has been discussed on python-ideas, it would be explicitly treated
as a CPython implementation detail, so
This might be tricky for alternative Python implementations which
might compile regular expressions into something rather different.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Franklin? Lee
wrote:
> I think it would be nice for manipulating (e.g. optimizing, possibly with
> JIT-like analysis) and comparing regexes. It can also be useful as a
> teaching tool, e.g. exercises in optimizing and comparing regexes.
Both great points in favor
I think it would be nice for manipulating (e.g. optimizing, possibly with
JIT-like analysis) and comparing regexes. It can also be useful as a
teaching tool, e.g. exercises in optimizing and comparing regexes.
I think the discussion should be on python-ideas, though.
On Feb 14, 2016 2:01 PM, "Jona
I'm new to Python's mailing lists, so please forgive me if I'm sending
this to the wrong list. :)
I filed http://bugs.python.org/issue26336 a few days ago, but now I
think this list might be a better place to get discussion going.
Basically, I'd like to see the bytecode of a compiled regex object
