Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 00:21:02, vous avez écrit :
>> Victor Stinner wrote:
>>> I will be very sad if someone ask me to keep bytearray filename support
>>> in 3.2 because I opened a lot of issues about surrogates and I would make
>>> my work more diffcult :-(
>> I don't have
Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 00:21:02, vous avez écrit :
> Victor Stinner wrote:
> > I will be very sad if someone ask me to keep bytearray filename support
> > in 3.2 because I opened a lot of issues about surrogates and I would make
> > my work more diffcult :-(
>
> I don't have an opinion one way or
Victor Stinner wrote:
> I will be very sad if someone ask me to keep bytearray filename support in
> 3.2
> because I opened a lot of issues about surrogates and I would make my work
> more diffcult :-(
I don't have an opinion one way or the other regarding bytearray, but
even if you deprecated
Hi,
About my work on unicode surrogates, I would like to reject bytearray
filename, especially in the PyUnicode_FSConverter function. As explained in
issue #8485, support bytearray requires to test the result type,
acquire/release a lock, the API is more complex, etc.
I don't know real world u
