On 14 November 2013 01:43, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Nick Coghlan writes:
>
> > The long gory history in http://bugs.python.org/issue7475 took a
> > different turn earlier this year when I noticed
> > (http://bugs.python.org/issue7475#msg187698) that the codecs module
> > already *had* type
Nick Coghlan writes:
> The long gory history in http://bugs.python.org/issue7475 took a
> different turn earlier this year when I noticed
> (http://bugs.python.org/issue7475#msg187698) that the codecs module
> already *had* type neutral helper functions in the form of
> codecs.encode and code
On 13.11.2013 15:29, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Back in Python 3.2, the non-Unicode codecs were restored to the
> standard library, but without the associated aliases (mostly due to
> some thoroughly confusing error messages when they were mistakenly
> used with the Unicode encoding convenience methods)
Back in Python 3.2, the non-Unicode codecs were restored to the
standard library, but without the associated aliases (mostly due to
some thoroughly confusing error messages when they were mistakenly
used with the Unicode encoding convenience methods).
The long gory history in http://bugs.python.or
