Jesse Noller writes:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org
wrote:
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the
Brett Cannon writes:
Mercurial has subrepo support, but that doesn't justify the need to
have every module in its own repository so they can be checked out
individually.
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules. So, eg, in order
to work on recent urllib, maybe you need a recent *but stable* email
but you
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules. So, eg, in order
to
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that
currently there is no tested mechanism to sync Subversion repository
back with Mercurial, so
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that
currently
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that
currently
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that
currently
Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller:
I am exhausted.
fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from core once
the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various
interpreters. I do not think that lots of small mirrors/repos for
each library is a net
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller:
I am exhausted.
fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from core once
the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various
interpreters. I do not
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested
with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and
up-to-date
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 17:17, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Jesse Noller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller:
I am exhausted.
fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from core once
the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various
David Cournapeau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 17:17, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik
14 matches
Mail list logo
