On 25 May 2017 at 20:32, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/05/17 17:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> I think the I inevitable conclusion is"thanks, but no thanks."
>
>
> Can I ask why this the inevitable conclusion? The Python Foundation make
> packages for Windows and macOS, why not snaps f
Hi,
On 23/05/17 17:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think the I inevitable conclusion is"thanks, but no thanks."
Can I ask why this the inevitable conclusion? The Python Foundation make
packages for Windows and macOS, why not snaps for Linux?
On May 23, 2017 8:05 AM, "Martin Wimpress"
mailto:
Well, it sounds like you have an answer to the question of whether the
cpython developers are interested in making official snap releases, but of
course this doesn't stop you making unofficial snap releases, and simple
standalone python distributions can be pretty handy. I just wanted to point
out
I think the I inevitable conclusion is"thanks, but no thanks."
On May 23, 2017 8:05 AM, "Martin Wimpress"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/05/17 00:56, Matt Billenstein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
>>
>>> Is there someone here who'd be interested in doing th
On Mon, 22 May 2017 23:56:43 +
Matt Billenstein wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> > Is there someone here who'd be interested in doing the same for Python?
>
> Do snaps support Windows and/or MacOS?
If you want a package manager that supports insta
Hi,
On 23/05/17 00:56, Matt Billenstein wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
Is there someone here who'd be interested in doing the same for Python?
Do snaps support Windows and/or MacOS?
You can't install snaps on Windows or macOS. Snaps are currently
ta
On 23/05/17 09:27, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 05/23/2017 01:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 08:08 Martin Wimpress
mailto:martin.wimpr...@canonical.com>>
wrote:
Hi all,
I work at Canonical as part of the engineering team developing Ubuntu
and Snapcraft [1] and I'm
In my opinion the trend of creating these standalone packages is pretty
bad. Developers that choose to support these kind of packages become
responsible not only for the code they distribute, but also for whether the
dependencies that are bundled in such a standalone package are up to date
and secu
On 05/23/2017 01:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 08:08 Martin Wimpress
mailto:martin.wimpr...@canonical.com>>
wrote:
Hi all,
I work at Canonical as part of the engineering team developing Ubuntu
and Snapcraft [1] and I'm a long time Python fan :-)
We've cr
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> Is there someone here who'd be interested in doing the same for Python?
Do snaps support Windows and/or MacOS?
m
--
Matt Billenstein
m...@vazor.com
http://www.vazor.com/
___
Python-Dev
On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 08:08 Martin Wimpress
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work at Canonical as part of the engineering team developing Ubuntu
> and Snapcraft [1] and I'm a long time Python fan :-)
>
> We've created snaps, a platform that enables projects to directly
> control delivery of software updat
Hi all,
I work at Canonical as part of the engineering team developing Ubuntu
and Snapcraft [1] and I'm a long time Python fan :-)
We've created snaps, a platform that enables projects to directly
control delivery of software updates to users. This video of a
lightning talk by dlang developers at
12 matches
Mail list logo
