On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Never have externally maintained packages.
Seriously! I concur with this.
Fortunately, it's not a real problem in this case.
There's the (maintained) simplejson package, and the unmaintained json
package. And simplejson works with o
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Brett Cannon wrote:
> [cc'ing Bob on his gmail address; didn't have any other address handy
> so I don't know if this will actually get to him]
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:54, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released:
>>
>
[cc'ing Bob on his gmail address; didn't have any other address handy
so I don't know if this will actually get to him]
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:54, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released:
>
> http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/10/simplejson-
2010/6/22 Dirkjan Ochtman :
> I guess we can't put these changes into 2.7 anymore? How can we make
> this better next time?
Never have externally maintained packages.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released:
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/10/simplejson-210/
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/31/simplejson-211/
It looks like any changes that didn't come from the Python tree didn't
go into the Python tree, either.
I guess w
