On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Anway, I'll come up with some specific patches and put them on the
tracker, starting with moving the source files for the binary
executables and making the simpler pythonrun/lifecycle split. I can
look into splitting
I have a feature branch where I'm intermittently working on the
bootstrapping changes described in PEP 432.
As part of those changes, I've cleaned up a few aspects of the repo layout:
* moved the main executable source file from Modules to a separate
Apps directory
* moved the _freezeimportlib
On May 28, 2013, at 10:15 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Would anyone object if I went ahead and posted patches for making
these changes to the main repo?
When you say post[ed] patches, do you mean you want to put them some place
for us to review? If so, sure, go ahead of course.
-Barry
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:25 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
I have a feature branch where I'm intermittently working on the
bootstrapping changes described in PEP 432.
As part of those changes, I've cleaned up a few aspects of the repo
layout:
* moved the main executable
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:25 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
I have a feature branch where I'm intermittently working on the
bootstrapping changes described in PEP 432.
As part of those changes, I've
As part of those changes, I've cleaned up a few aspects of the repo
layout:
* moved the main executable source file from Modules to a separate
Apps directory
Do you mean things that go into the shared library
(libpythonXX/pythonXX.dll) vs executables?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't know any other short word for things with main
functions that we ship to end users :)
We used to call such things programs, but that term may no longer be
in popular parlance. :-) Or is it just too
2013/5/28 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:25 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
I have a feature branch where I'm intermittently working on the
bootstrapping changes described
28.05.13 16:07, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:25 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
* moved the main executable source file from Modules to a separate
Apps directory
Sounds fine (I
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
28.05.13 16:07, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:25 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
* moved the
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 23:07:37 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
It was deliberate - a big part of PEP 432 is making sure that all the
interpreter state lives *in* the interpreter state (as part of the
config struct). Splitting the two into separate compilation modules
makes it
Am 28.05.13 15:07, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
Sounds fine (I don't like Apps much, but hey :-)).
Unfortunately, I don't know any other short word for things with main
functions that we ship to end users :)
Bike-sheddingly: POSIX calls them commands and utilities:
Am 28.05.13 18:20, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 23:07:37 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
It was deliberate - a big part of PEP 432 is making sure that all the
interpreter state lives *in* the interpreter state (as part of the
config struct).
It sounds a bit
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Am 28.05.13 18:20, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Le Tue, 28 May 2013 23:07:37 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
It was deliberate - a big part of PEP 432 is making sure that all the
interpreter state lives
14 matches
Mail list logo
