On 6/27/06, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bad Case Option (5) -- ad hoc mixture
> -
>
> Pick an arbitrary set of rules, and follow it.
>
> Guido is currently leaning towards this, with the rules being "freeze
> at definition", raise for unhashable, igno
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jim Jewett wrote:
> (Almost) everyone agrees that the case expressions SHOULD be run-time
> constants. The disagreements are largely over what to do when this
> gets violated.
I like your summary and understood most of it (options 1, 2, 3, 5, 6).
The only part i didn't unders
On 6/27/06, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/26/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like Python's rules to be simple, and I
> > prefer to occasionally close off a potential optimization path in the
> > sake of simplicity.
>
> (Almost) everyone agrees that the case expr
On 6/26/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like Python's rules to be simple, and I
> prefer to occasionally close off a potential optimization path in the
> sake of simplicity.
(Almost) everyone agrees that the case expressions SHOULD be run-time
constants. The disagreements are
