On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:23:14PM -0800, Trent Nelson wrote:
> * Updates to externals/(tcl|tk)-8.5.9.x so that they both build with
> VS2010.
Before I go updating tcl/tk, any thoughts on bumping our support to
the latest revision, 8.5.11?
I guess the same question applies to al
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:41, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:37, Catalin Iacob wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
>> wrote:
>> ...
>>> P.S. Here is my personal list of requirements and non-requirements:
>> ...
>>> - must generate binaries that run on W
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:37, Catalin Iacob wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> ...
>> P.S. Here is my personal list of requirements and non-requirements:
> ...
>> - must generate binaries that run on Windows XP
>
> I recently read about Firefox switching to VS201
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
...
> P.S. Here is my personal list of requirements and non-requirements:
...
> - must generate binaries that run on Windows XP
I recently read about Firefox switching to VS2010 and therefore
needing to drop support for Windows 2000, XP RT
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 14:23, Trent Nelson wrote:
> Brian, what are your plans? Are you going to continue working in
> hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port then merge everything over when
> ready? I have some time available to work on this for the next
> three weeks or so and would like
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:54:31PM -0800, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
> > Is this considered a new feature that has to be in by the first beta?
> > I'm hoping to have it completed much sooner than that so we can get
> > mileage on it, but is there a cutoff for changing the compiler?
>
> At some point
> I... I think I might have already done this, inadvertently. I
> needed an x64 VS2010 debug build of Subversion/APR*/Python a few
> weeks ago -- forgetting the fact that we're still on VS2008.
There is a lot of duplication of work going on here: at least four
people have done the sam
Is this considered a new feature that has to be in by the first beta?
I'm hoping to have it completed much sooner than that so we can get
mileage on it, but is there a cutoff for changing the compiler?
At some point, I'll start doing this myself if it hasn't been done by
then, and I would certai
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:11, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:01, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> I previously completed the port at my old company (but could not
>>> release it), and I have a good bit of it completed for us at
>>> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port/. That rep
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:01, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I previously completed the port at my old company (but could not
>> release it), and I have a good bit of it completed for us at
>> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port/. That repo is a little bit
>> behind 'default' but updating it sho
> I previously completed the port at my old company (but could not
> release it), and I have a good bit of it completed for us at
> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port/. That repo is a little bit
> behind 'default' but updating it shouldn't pose any problems.
So: do you agree that we switch? D
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 14:43, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> It seems a number of people are interested that the Python trunk
> switches to Visual Studio 2010 *now*. I've been hesitant to agree
> to such a change, as I still hope that Python can skip over VS 2010
> (a.k.a. VS 10), and go straight to
It seems a number of people are interested that the Python trunk
switches to Visual Studio 2010 *now*. I've been hesitant to agree
to such a change, as I still hope that Python can skip over VS 2010
(a.k.a. VS 10), and go straight to VS 11.
However, I just learned that VS 11 supposed ready VS 10
13 matches
Mail list logo
