On 09/03/2012 20:44, Thomas Wouters wrote:
(...) it would be nice to still
run the tests that can be run without _testcapi. Any objections to
fixing the tests to use test.support.import_module() for _testcapi and a
'needs_testcapi' skipping decorator?
test.support.import_module() looks fine fo
2012/3/9 Thomas Wouters :
>
> While testing Python 2.7 internally (at Google) I noticed that (now that
> ImportErrors aren't automatically test skips) lots of tests fail if you
> don't have the _testcapi module. These tests are (as far as I've seen)
> properly marked as cpython-only, but when some
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 14:44, Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
> While testing Python 2.7 internally (at Google) I noticed that (now that
> ImportErrors aren't automatically test skips) lots of tests fail if you
> don't have the _testcapi module. These tests are (as far as I've seen)
> properly marked as
While testing Python 2.7 internally (at Google) I noticed that (now that
ImportErrors aren't automatically test skips) lots of tests fail if you
don't have the _testcapi module. These tests are (as far as I've seen)
properly marked as cpython-only, but when some wacko decides the _testcapi
module s
