05.12.17 01:21, MRAB пише:
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width match""".
If it's about to return a zero-width match that's jo
06.12.17 15:37, Paul Moore пише:
Behaviour (1) means that we'd get
>>> regex.sub(r'\w*', 'x', 'hello world', flags=regex.VERSION1)
'xx xx'
(because \w* matches the empty string after each word, as well as each
word itself). I just tested in Perl, and that is indeed what happens
there as well.
On 6 December 2017 at 13:13, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 05.12.17 22:26, Terry Reedy пише:
>>
>> On 12/4/2017 6:21 PM, MRAB wrote:
>>>
>>> I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
>>> zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but never a
>>> zero-
05.12.17 22:26, Terry Reedy пише:
On 12/4/2017 6:21 PM, MRAB wrote:
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour
of zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width
match""".
Is this d
05.12.17 01:21, MRAB пише:
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width match""".
If it's about to return a zero-width match that's jo
On 2017-12-05 20:26, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/4/2017 6:21 PM, MRAB wrote:
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width match""".
Is t
On 12/4/2017 6:21 PM, MRAB wrote:
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width match""".
Is this different from current re or regex?
I've finally come to a conclusion as to what the "correct" behaviour of
zero-width matches should be: """always return the first match, but
never a zero-width match that is joined to a previous zero-width match""".
If it's about to return a zero-width match that's joined to a previous
zero-wid
