On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
There are, apparently, still callers of the nb_long slot, so I would be
cautious.
We should remove all usage of it and rename it to
I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
have a __long__ method in 3.x. Shouldn't this have disappeared as
part of the int/long unification? Is there any reason not to remove this
(by setting the nb_long entry to 0 in all three cases)?
Mark
I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
have a __long__ method in 3.x. Shouldn't this have disappeared as
part of the int/long unification? Is there any reason not to remove this
(by setting the nb_long entry to 0 in all three cases)?
There are, apparently,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
have a __long__ method in 3.x. Shouldn't this have disappeared as
part of the int/long unification? Is there any reason not to remove this
(by
