Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Walter Dörwald wrote: > On 05.07.10 16:19, Nick Coghlan wrote: > http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ *does* include coverage info for stuff > written in C, see for example: > >   http://coverage.livinglogic.de/Objects/unicodeobject.c.html Ah, I missed that. Cool. > H

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-06 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Walter Dörwald wrote: > http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ *does* include coverage info for stuff > written in C, see for example: > >   http://coverage.livinglogic.de/Objects/unicodeobject.c.html > > However it *is* strange that test_audioop.py gets executed, but > au

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-06 Thread Walter Dörwald
On 05.07.10 16:19, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: >> On 7/4/2010 2:31 AM, Éric Araujo wrote: But Python tests lack coverage stats, so it is hard to say anything. >>> >>> FYI: http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ >> >> Turns out the audioop is one of t

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 7/4/2010 2:31 AM, Éric Araujo wrote: >>> >>> But Python tests lack coverage stats, so it is hard to say anything. >> >> FYI: http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ > > Turns out the audioop is one of the best covered modules, at 98% Alas, those are

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-04 Thread Terry Reedy
On 7/4/2010 2:31 AM, Éric Araujo wrote: But Python tests lack coverage stats, so it is hard to say anything. FYI: http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ Turns out the audioop is one of the best covered modules, at 98% -- Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev m

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Éric Araujo
> But Python tests lack coverage stats, so it is hard to say anything. FYI: http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ Regards ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.or

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > In the worst case, a function rejects valid data. If I have to choose, I > prefer to reject valid data than a security vulnerability. But audioop has > tests and I don't think that my patch breaks anything :-) But Python tests lack coverag

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 14:40:57 +0200 Victor Stinner wrote: > Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 14:26:53, Victor Stinner a écrit : > > In the worst case, a function rejects valid data. If I have to choose, I > > prefer to reject valid data than a security vulnerability. But audioop has > > tests and I don't t

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Victor Stinner
Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 14:26:53, Victor Stinner a écrit : > In the worst case, a function rejects valid data. If I have to choose, I > prefer to reject valid data than a security vulnerability. But audioop has > tests and I don't think that my patch breaks anything :-) I checked the test suite:

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Jesse Noller
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the >> moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 > > I added Jesse to the nosy list for that as well. > > Cheers, > Nick

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Victor Stinner
Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 12:17:16, Mark Dickinson a écrit : > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the > > moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 > > I've just made http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 a releas

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:17:16 +0100 Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the > > moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 > > I've just made http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 a release blo

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-03 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the > moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 I've just made http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 a release blocker too, I'm afraid. It's a potential security vulnerability in t

Re: [Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-02 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the > moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 I added Jesse to the nosy list for that as well. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Aust

[Python-Dev] blocking 2.7

2010-07-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144 -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://ma