26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger написав(ла):
+result = [(elem, i) for i, elem in zip(range(n), it)]
Perhaps it is worth to add simple comment explaining why this is not
equivalent to just list(zip(it, range(n))). Otherwise it can be
unintentionally optimized in future.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger написав(ла):
+result = [(elem, i) for i, elem in zip(range(n), it)]
Perhaps it is worth to add simple comment explaining why this is not
equivalent to just list(zip(it,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger написав(ла):
+result = [(elem, i) for i, elem in zip(range(n), it)]
Perhaps it is worth to add
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Michael Urman mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
wrote:
26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger написав(ла):
+result =
On 27.05.2014 11:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger написав(ла):
+result = [(elem, i) for i, elem in zip(range(n), it)]
Perhaps it is worth to add simple comment explaining why this
On May 27, 2014, at 1:58 AM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it is worth to add simple comment explaining why this is not
equivalent to just list(zip(it, range(n))). Otherwise it can be
unintentionally optimized in future.
FWIW, that is covered by the test cases.
If you
On 27/05/2014 13:44, Tal Einat wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Michael Urman mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
26.05.14 10:59, raymond.hettinger
