Re: [Python-Dev] cross-compile patches

2007-03-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: > 1608267 - added comment, asking for explanation. looks bogus. > 1608579 - problem analysis + solution looks good > 1507247 - I can reproduce the problem it tries to fix. Fix looks ok. > 1520879 - trivial fix; should go in. disregard the comment about relative > --prefix

Re: [Python-Dev] cross-compile patches

2006-12-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Martin v. Löwis escreveu: > Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: >> In response to Martin v Loewis' initial reply we have sent in >> contributor agreements, but nothing else has happened so far. >> >> I was wondering whether there is any way for me to speed up the review >> process. > > It may not be what yo

Re: [Python-Dev] cross-compile patches

2006-12-05 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: > In response to Martin v Loewis' initial reply we have sent in > contributor agreements, but nothing else has happened so far. > > I was wondering whether there is any way for me to speed up the review > process. It may not be what you expect to hear, but there actually

[Python-Dev] cross-compile patches

2006-12-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hello all, A couple of weeks ago, I posted a collection of patches to Python 2.5 on SF.net (#1597850) that enable python to be cross-compiled using standard tools (ie. configure and environment settings), among others on Linux/Darwin to Mingw32/Linux/Freebsd. In response to Martin v Loewis' in