Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> In contrast, a name like "functional" suggests that
> some of these tools don't quite fit.
The original intent was that the functional module
become the home of typical utilities for functional style
programming. partial was there were patches (such
as 1412451) providi
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> In PEP 356, there is even a suggestion to "add builtin @deprecated
>> decorator?".
>
> Restraint please.
Well, that sentence wasn't meant in the sense of "we should add it" but
in the sense of "why shouldn't we put it in functools _if_ we add it, when
it's even sugges
On 3/12/06, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Nick Coghlan]
> > I agree it makes sense to have "decorator", "memoize", "deprecated" and
> > "partial" all being members of the same module, whether the name be
> > "functools" or "functional" (although I have a slight preference for
> >
> In PEP 356, there is even a suggestion to "add builtin @deprecated
> decorator?".
Restraint please. Go easy on the decorator additions.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
U
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>> ...
>>> memoize seems to fit into functools fairly well, though deprecated not
>>> so much. functools is similarly named to itertools, another module
>>> that
>>> is kind of vague in scope (thou
[Nick Coghlan]
> I agree it makes sense to have "decorator", "memoize", "deprecated" and
> "partial" all being members of the same module, whether the name be
> "functools" or "functional" (although I have a slight preference for
> "functools" due to the parallel with "itertools").
I like "functoo
Alex Martelli wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
> ...
>> memoize seems to fit into functools fairly well, though deprecated not
>> so much. functools is similarly named to itertools, another module
>> that
>> is kind of vague in scope (though functools is much more va
[Ian Bicking]
>> memoize seems to fit into functools fairly well, though deprecated not
>> so much. functools is similarly named to itertools, another module
>> that
>> is kind of vague in scope (though functools is much more vague).
>> partial would make just as much sense in functools as in func
On Mar 12, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
...
> memoize seems to fit into functools fairly well, though deprecated not
> so much. functools is similarly named to itertools, another module
> that
> is kind of vague in scope (though functools is much more vague).
> partial would make j
Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Also, I thought we were trying to move away from modules that shared a name
>> with one of their public functions or classes. As it is, I'm not even sure
>> that a name like "decorator" gives the right emphasis.
>
> I thought about "decorators" too, that would make "decora
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to underlay my proposals with facts, I've written a simple decorator
>> module containing at the moment only the "decorator" decorator.
>>
>> http://python.org/sf/1448297
>>
>> It is implemented as a C extension module _decorator which conta
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to underlay my proposals with facts, I've written a simple decorator
>> module containing at the moment only the "decorator" decorator.
Sorry, I forgot the initial comment which was meant to be "Thanks for moving
this proposal forward" :)
It
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to underlay my proposals with facts, I've written a simple decorator
> module containing at the moment only the "decorator" decorator.
>
> http://python.org/sf/1448297
>
> It is implemented as a C extension module _decorator which contains the
> decorator object (mo
Hi,
to underlay my proposals with facts, I've written a simple decorator
module containing at the moment only the "decorator" decorator.
http://python.org/sf/1448297
It is implemented as a C extension module _decorator which contains the
decorator object (modelled after the functional.partial ob
14 matches
Mail list logo
