[Fredrik Lundh]
>> (but alright, as long as you don't call me "Fred"...)
[Steve Holden]
> Did I *ever* do that? That would have been an embarrassing slip ;-)
I know I'm extremely late, but there should be a POTF (Pun Of The
Fortnight) from now on.
A member of the Mund-SIG
__
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>
>
>>>I'd say that any spelling with more than 500,000 google hits is perfectly
>>>valid...
>>>
>>
>>Anything you say, Frederick ...
>>
>>thirteen-million-google-hits-can't-possibly-be-wrong-ly y'rs - steve
>
>
> oh, frederick is a perfectly valid e
Steve Holden wrote:
>> I'd say that any spelling with more than 500,000 google hits is perfectly
>> valid...
>>
> Anything you say, Frederick ...
>
> thirteen-million-google-hits-can't-possibly-be-wrong-ly y'rs - steve
oh, frederick is a perfectly valid english spelling of the germanic name
"F
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>
>
>>That's "embarrassing", by the way. You're obviously having a bad
>>spelling day :-)
>
>
> I'd say that any spelling with more than 500,000 google hits is perfectly
> valid...
>
Anything you say, Frederick ...
thirteen-million-google-hits-can't
Steve Holden wrote:
> That's "embarrassing", by the way. You're obviously having a bad
> spelling day :-)
I'd say that any spelling with more than 500,000 google hits is perfectly
valid...
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> just noticed an embarrasing misspelling in one of my recent checkins, only
That's "embarrassing", by the way. You're obviously having a bad
spelling day :-)
not-throwing-stones-ly y'rs - steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I have now installed this hook to allow editing svn:log; please try
> again.
$ svn propedit --revprop -r 41759 svn:log
Set new value for property 'svn:log' on revision 41759
thanks! /F
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> just noticed an embarrasing misspelling in one of my recent checkins, only
> to find that I cannot fix it:
>
> $ svn propedit --revprop -r 41759 svn:log
> svn: Repository has not been enabled to accept revision propchanges;
> ask the administrator to create a pre-revprop-ch
just noticed an embarrasing misspelling in one of my recent checkins, only
to find that I cannot fix it:
$ svn propedit --revprop -r 41759 svn:log
svn: Repository has not been enabled to accept revision propchanges;
ask the administrator to create a pre-revprop-change hook
$
would it be a good i
