Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Michael Hudson]
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating?
Depends on where that is.
It seems to me that the top bit of ob_digit[0] is always 0, for example,
Yes, the top bit of
Michael Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Michael Hudson]
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating?
Depends on where that is.
[...]
I'd much rather give struct _longobject a
[Michael Hudson]
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating?
Depends on where that is.
It seems to me that the top bit of ob_digit[0] is always 0, for example,
Yes, the top bit of ob_digit[i], for all relevant i, is 0 on
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:14:16PM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote:
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating?
As I guess your goal is to get rid of all the if (size 0) size = -size in
object.c and friends, I
Michael Hudson wrote:
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating? It seems to me that the
top bit of ob_digit[0] is always 0, for example, and I'm sure this
would result no less convolution in longobject.c it'd be considerably
