(I still don't really have net access back after moving house - just
chiming in briefly via my mobile)
Anyway, I think there is one very good reason for NOT defining a multi-
with statement in terms of an existing tuple: it gains us nothing
except speed over contextlib.nested. The whole
Hi,
this is just a short notice that Mattias Brändström and I have finished a
patch to implement the previously discussed and mostly warmly welcomed
extension to with's syntax, allowing
with A() as a, B() as b:
to be written instead of
with A() as a:
with B() as b:
This syntax
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
this is just a short notice that Mattias Brändström and I have finished a
patch to implement the previously discussed and mostly warmly welcomed
extension to with's syntax, allowing
with A() as a, B() as b:
to be
FWIW, I prefer Fredrik's wish too.
Alex
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
this is just a short notice that Mattias Brändström and I have finished a
patch to
Fredrik Johansson schrieb:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
this is just a short notice that Mattias Brändström and I have finished a
patch to implement the previously discussed and mostly warmly welcomed
extension to with's syntax, allowing
with
