On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also move
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also move
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also
On Jun 20, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
Perhaps we need a split between networking technologies and
network-based applications.
Perhaps that would help.
I certainly see HTTP as being on the same layer as SMTP and the like,
but application protocols that ride on top of HTTP are a
