Memories of days past... Python had several regular expression
implementations before, one of which was called "regex".
But I would rather not have a new module -- I would much rather have a
flag specifying the new (backwards incompatible) syntax/semantics. The
flag would have a long name (e.g. re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 14:10, MRAB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
> opinion on a number of matters:
>
> Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
> zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour s
MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by default in case any ex
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/12/2010 5:10 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour sh
On 1/12/2010 5:10 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by default in case any existing softwa
