Steve Holden wrote:
> Connelly Barnes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Perhaps I am the only one bothered by the timeit
>> module, but it seems poorly designed to me.
>>
>> First of all, it should use a geometric series with a
>> timeout value to detect how many iterations it should
>> perform. Currently, the
Connelly Barnes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Perhaps I am the only one bothered by the timeit
>> module, but it seems poorly designed to me.
>>
>> First of all, it should use a geometric series with a
>> timeout value to detect how many iterations it should
>> perform. Currently, the user is required to
Connelly Barnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps I am the only one bothered by the timeit
> module, but it seems poorly designed to me.
>
> First of all, it should use a geometric series with a
> timeout value to detect how many iterations it should
> perform. Currently, the user is required to manually
Hi,
Perhaps I am the only one bothered by the timeit
module, but it seems poorly designed to me.
First of all, it should use a geometric series with a
timeout value to detect how many iterations it should
perform. Currently, the user is required to manually
specify the number of iterations (the
