Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
I feel we should make the tracker more useful for core developers,
volunteers and end-users. I also think having a clear workflow helps a
lot. Yet, I'd rather have a tracker that allowed users with different
interpretations to work as they feel most comfortable than
On Tue Mar 24 02:06:29 CET 2009, Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenburg at
gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps some developers have a well-established workflow and interpret these
flag in a particular, consistent fashion, however part of the purpose of the
issue tracker is to allow a diverse group to work on
R. David Murray wrote:
So, having triaged a few issues, here are my thoughts.
The current workflow is roughly:
o test needed
o patch needed
o patch review
o commit review
One can look at these and see what needs to be done next. I think
that in practice the above list
o consensus needed
o test needed
o patch needed
o patch needs work
o patch review
o commit review
The first of these additional items is equivalent to your bullet item
above. I would propose that the issue, regardless of whether or not
it is a bug fix or a
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 at 21:27, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
o consensus needed
o test needed
o patch needed
o patch needs work
o patch review
o commit review
The first of these additional items is equivalent to your bullet item
above. I would propose that the issue,
So, 'confirmed' instead of 'consensus needed' (or confirmed/approved,
to cover feature requests), and 'patch is appropriate' that comes...I'm
not quite sure where?
If the person who did the triage actually thinks the patch is ready to
be committed, it would be commit review. Not sure in what
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 at 22:41, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
If the person doing the triage has made a final call, the issue can
enter the next stage. There should never be debate on the tracker, IMO
(although there often is). It might be that people disagree with a
triage, then they should appeal to
OK, so given this then I revise the way I understand what is happening
in the ticket I'm looking at: a reviewer has said this patch needs
work and the submitter has not responded. Since the behavior has been
accepted as a valid bug this means...I can either work on the patch, or
post a
R. David Murray wrote:
I understood from posts I saw go by earlier from Daniel that 'pending'
meant 'close pending unless there is feedback to the contrary' (and I
just used it that way). It sounds like that is indeed correct but not
universally known, and thus I would suggest that at a
Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm continuing to (slowly) work through issues. I have been looking
particularly at a lot of the open issues regarding strftime.
It would be great to put in some of those extra status options that were
discussed recently...
Open/New
Needs help
Hi Ron,
Good flowchart.
Cheers,
-T
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Ron Adam r...@ronadam.com wrote:
Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm continuing to (slowly) work through issues. I have been looking
particularly at a lot of the open issues regarding strftime.
It would be great
R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 at 21:27, Martin v. L�wis wrote:
o consensus needed
o test needed
o patch needed
o patch needs work
o patch review
o commit review
The first of these additional items is equivalent to your bullet item
above. I would
2009/3/22 Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
That would be great. It occurs to me that if we wanted to use Stage
settings, it would be easy to search for issues which are not closed by
literally searching for 'not closed' rather than 'open'. I think it's also
unclear
That would be great. It occurs to me that if we wanted to use
Stage settings, it would be easy to search for issues which are
not closed by literally searching for 'not closed' rather than
'open'. I think it's also unclear whether the 'pending' stage means
'suspended
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
That would be great. It occurs to me that if we wanted to use
Stage settings, it would be easy to search for issues which are
not closed by literally searching for 'not closed' rather than
'open'. I
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 at 16:20, Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:
literally searching for 'not closed' rather than 'open'. I think it's also
unclear whether the 'pending' stage means 'suspended pending additional user
feedback' or 'resolution of this issue is impending'. My understanding was
that it
Hi Daniel,
That would be great. It occurs to me that if we wanted to use Stage
settings, it would be easy to search for issues which are not closed by
literally searching for 'not closed' rather than 'open'. I think it's also
unclear whether the 'pending' stage means 'suspended pending additional
It would be great to put in some of those extra status options that were
discussed recently...
Open/New
Needs help / Chatting
Under development
Pending feedback
Closed
Are you sure that you want them to be status options? Why not stages?
ISTM that an issue that Needs help
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 23:47, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
It would be great to put in some of those extra status options that were
discussed recently...
Open/New
Needs help / Chatting
Under development
Pending feedback
Closed
Are you sure that you
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 23:47, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
It would be great to put in some of those extra status options
that were
discussed recently...
Open/New
Needs help / Chatting
Under development
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In addition, I would like to see a specification of the exact labels to
be used, plus a one-line description that should be attached to the
labels.
Tennessee,
If you'd like to test those additional status options, I'm setting a
test instance of the Python tracker up at
Hi all,
I'm continuing to (slowly) work through issues. I have been looking
particularly at a lot of the open issues regarding strftime.
It would be great to put in some of those extra status options that were
discussed recently...
Open/New
Needs help / Chatting
Under development
22 matches
Mail list logo
