I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail
reader, VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still
use Rmail and Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment
trying to get XEmacs built with MULE is worth the effort.
Anders
s...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail reader,
VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still use Rmail and
Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment trying to get XEmacs
built with MULE is worth the effort.
Use a
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE to it.) Is there some reason such messages
can't
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs.
Antoine Hmm, are you sure? Software (especially mail-reading software)
Antoine that doesn't support utf-8 in 2011 should be considered
Antoine extremely broken.
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are used?
Eugene
On 27.03.2011 18:33, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:33:04 +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
In my experience it is very difficult to get a whole system
configured, such that UTF-8 works reliably. In my case that would
mean, I think, Linux, glibc, mutt, screen, elinks, and SecureCRT would
all have to simultaneously be configured
Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:13:29PM -0400, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
Mind you, I've never managed to get the -- button working reliably
either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
No idea what that is.
Backspace key.
___
Python-Dev
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of
mail reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible
(read: fairly easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Eugene Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are
Martin Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
reader. (I use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support
utf-8 out of the box. I
On 3/27/2011 2:13 PM, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:46:35 +0100, Jon Ribbens
jon+python-...@unequivocal.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
Mind you, I've never managed to get the -- button working reliably
either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
No idea
16 matches
Mail list logo
