On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, brian.curtin python-check...@python.org wrote:
Author: brian.curtin
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:29:29 2010
New Revision: 84559
Log:
Fix #8956. ValueError message was only mentioning one signal.
Rather than list out the three signals (or more over time), the message
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 07:34, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, brian.curtin python-check...@python.org
wrote:
Author: brian.curtin
Date: Mon Sep 6 18:29:29 2010
New Revision: 84559
Log:
Fix #8956. ValueError message was only mentioning one
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, seems reasonable to me.
Does raise ValueError(Unsupported signal: {}.format(sig)) look fine,
or is there a more preferred format when displaying bad values in exception
messages?
No, that's about what I was
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 08:19, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sure, seems reasonable to me.
Does raise ValueError(Unsupported signal: {}.format(sig)) look
fine,
or is there a more preferred format when
