Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-21 Thread Eric Smith
Eric Smith wrote: Alessio Giovanni Baroni wrote: There are some cases of OutOfMemory? On my machine the float->string conversion is all ok. Also 'make test' is all ok. I assume you're talking about issue 5775. I think it's all explained in the bug report. Basically, the float->string conversi

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-21 Thread Eric Smith
Alessio Giovanni Baroni wrote: There are some cases of OutOfMemory? On my machine the float->string conversion is all ok. Also 'make test' is all ok. I assume you're talking about issue 5775. I think it's all explained in the bug report. Basically, the float->string conversion can now return

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-21 Thread Alessio Giovanni Baroni
There are some cases of OutOfMemory? On my machine the float->string conversion is all ok. Also 'make test' is all ok. 2009/4/21 Benjamin Peterson > The first (and only) beta of 3.1 is scheduled for less than 2 weeks > away, May 2nd, and is creeping onto the horizon. There are currently 6 > bloc

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/4/20 Ned Deily : > In article > <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, >  Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> I forgot one: [...] > > What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? I just bumped priority and left a comment. -- Regards, Benjamin __

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/4/20 Barry Warsaw : > On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > >> In article >> <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, >> Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>> >>> I forgot one: [...] >> >> What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? > > Were we going to remo

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Ned Deily
In article <40d62762-abab-4de1-9be2-798e40ae2...@python.org>, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > > > In article > > <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, > > Benjamin Peterson wrote: > >> I forgot one: [...] > > > > What about #5756 -

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: In article <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, Benjamin Peterson wrote: I forgot one: [...] What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? Were we going to remove this from 2.7 also? I'm working on splitting

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Ned Deily
In article <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > I forgot one: [...] What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? -- Ned Deily, n...@acm.org ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
I forgot one: #4136 - Porting the json changes to py3k - This issue exposed the brokenness of the json module in py3k. Was any consensus reached about what the API of json should be? If the beta time rolls around and nothing has changed on this issue, I think Antoine's patch, which makes json inpu