Michael Chermside wrote:
> (PS: too bad I can't buy stock in Coverity. How come all the GOOD
> companies are private? I had to wait around 6 years before I could
> buy stock in Google.)
Maybe because the companies whose stock is available early are companies
bent on producing stock profits, rather
Dennis Allison writes:
> I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
> clearly.
Ben Chelf writes:
> Of course it's no surprise that I see open
> source projects everywhere -- as part of infrastructure or part of code
> bases that people are developing. So from a Coverity
On 3/7/06, Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Putting on my idealistic hat and remembering back my grad school days, Ithink we're on to something very new in the world of source codeanalysis. I really just want every developer to use source code analysiswhile they write code (remember, idealistic
> The Coverty marketing droids need to be a bit less anal about getting
> people to register at the website. IMHO, the technology should be
Honestly, I laughed out loud when I read this. ;) So thanks for that.
>
> I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
> clearl
On 3/6/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Didn't we set up a "security swat team" some time ago? If not, we
> > > should. Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like
> > > to be on it.
> >
> > Yep, it's c
FWIW, coverity has been busy marketing this already:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/84465/key-opensource-code-passes-muster.html
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> > [Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > > ...
> > > I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a
> > > bit
> > > further for your project, please have a couple of core maintai
[Barry]
> Yep, it's called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailing
> list, which I'd be happy for you to join!).
If guessing the right Mailman URL was the semi-secret test, I passed :-)
> I definitely think that group of folks at the least should review the results.
Yup!
_
On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Didn't we set up a "security swat team" some time ago? If not, we> should. Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like> to be on it.Yep, it's called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailinglist, which I'd be happy
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > ...
> > I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
> > further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
> > group nominated individuals) reach out to me
[Ben Chelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> ...
> I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
> further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
> group nominated individuals) reach out to me to request access.
Didn't we set up a "security swat team" som
11 matches
Mail list logo