Daniel Berlin wrote:
> The argument "network and disk is cheap" doesn't work for us when you
> are talking 5-10 gigabytes of initial transfer :). However, I doubt
> it's more than a hundred meg or so for python, if that.
>
> You may run into these problems in 10 years :)
I don't know how bazaar-
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 23:58 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Here's another POV.
>
> I think I agree with Daniel's view, in particular wrt. to performance.
> Whatever the replacement tool, it should perform as well or better
> than CVS currently does; it also shouldn't
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 11:13 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Here's another POV. (Why does evereybody keep emailing me personally?)
>
Because we love you, and I forgot to cc python-dev.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.py
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Here's another POV.
I think I agree with Daniel's view, in particular wrt. to performance.
Whatever the replacement tool, it should perform as well or better
than CVS currently does; it also shouldn't perform much worse than
subversion.
I've been using git (or, rather, c
