On 05/03/13 09:08, Brett Cannon wrote:
Depends on your paranoia. If you're worried about accidentally lifting IP
merely by reading someone's source code, then you wouldn't want to touch
code without the CLA signed.
Now I'm not that paranoid, but I'm still not about to commit someone's code
now
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On 05/03/13 09:08, Brett Cannon wrote:
Depends on your paranoia. If you're worried about accidentally lifting IP
merely by reading someone's source code, then you wouldn't want to touch
code without the CLA signed.
Steven D'Aprano writes:
Pardon my ignorance, but how does a CLA protect us in the event of an IP
violation?
By licensing the content to the PSF, the contributor implicitly claims
that he has the right to do so (I think the AFL even has an explicit
provenance clause). This protects the PSF
On 3/6/2013 3:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 05/03/13 09:08, Brett Cannon wrote:
Depends on your paranoia. If you're worried about accidentally lifting IP
merely by reading someone's source code, then you wouldn't want to touch
code without the CLA signed.
Now I'm not that paranoid, but I'm
On 3/4/2013 3:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:46:48 -0500
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Either policy could be facilitated by tracker changes. In order to see
the file upload box, one must login and the tracker knows who has a CLA
on file (as indicated by a * suffix
Terry Reedy writes:
or a proposal for a change that is given within a bug tracker message?
I view a proposal for a change as just an idea. Such usually get
re-written by whoever creates an actual patch.
Precisely how U.S. law would view it, implying no copyright issue.
If this really
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
With this in place I would like to propose that all patches submitted to
Le 05/03/2013 04:13, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
Mark Lawrence writes:
People already use the bug tracker as an excuse not to contribute,
wouldn't this requirement make the situation worse?
A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision not to contribute to
the distribution
my 2
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Baptiste Carvello
de...@baptiste-carvello.net wrote:
Le 05/03/2013 04:13, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
Mark Lawrence writes:
People already use the bug tracker as an excuse not to contribute,
wouldn't this requirement make the situation worse?
A
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:22:07 -0500, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Baptiste Carvello
de...@baptiste-carvello.net wrote:
Le 05/03/2013 04:13, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
Mark Lawrence writes:
People already use the bug tracker as an excuse
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a summary follows.
We've now moved to an electronic Contributor License Agreement form at
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a summary follows.
...
Brian,
Do you want old-timers like me who have a wet-signed fax gathering dust in
a box at
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a summary follows.
...
Brian,
Do you want
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a summary follows.
We've now moved to an electronic Contributor License Agreement form at
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a summary follows.
We've now moved
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:46:48 -0500
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
On 04/03/2013 20:46, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html,
but a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 04/03/2013 20:46, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
The full announcement is at
On 3/4/2013 3:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:46:48 -0500
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
With this in place I would like to propose that all patches submitted to
bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org must come from someone
On 04/03/2013 22:08, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
mailto:breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 04/03/2013 20:46, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM,
Mark Lawrence writes:
People already use the bug tracker as an excuse not to contribute,
wouldn't this requirement make the situation worse?
A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision not to contribute to
the distribution, no matter how noisy they are on the tracker and
list. I think
On 3/4/2013 7:51 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Who's talking source code, you're previously mentioned *ALL* patches
needing a CLA. Does this mean you have to sign a CLA for a one line
documentation patch?
It it is a one char typo, I would not bother downloading the patch, or
adding a person to
22 matches
Mail list logo
