On 7/31/2010 5:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
But yes, the docs should clarify that *any* use of __*__ names, in
*any* context, that does not follow explicitly documented use, is
subject to breakage without warning.
http://bugs.python.org/issue9451
Strengthen __*__ system name warning
My
On Jul 30, 2010, at 05:23 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
First appeared in docs for 2.6 (October 02, 2008). Not sure if that
is when it first because constrained this way.
http://docs.python.org/library/constants.html?highlight=__debug__#__debug__
Thanks Eric, this is probably the right section of the
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:44:42 am Guido van Rossum wrote:
http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#reserved-classes-of-identifiers
On Jul 31, 2010, at 08:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a small concern about the wording of that, specifically this:
System-defined names. These
First appeared in docs for 2.6 (October 02, 2008). Not sure if that is when it
first because constrained this way.
http://docs.python.org/library/constants.html?highlight=__debug__#__debug__
-eric
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+esnow=verio@python.org
