On 15 December 2017 at 19:35, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.12.17 20:02, Yury Selivanov пише:
>
>> But nobody decorates __new__ with a @staticmethod. And making
>> __class_getitem__ a @classmethod will only confuse users -- that's all
>> I'm saying.
>>
>> So I'm +1 to keep
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> In this case I suggest to make __class_getitem__ an automatic class method
> like __init_subclass__.
+1 I was just about to suggest the same thing.
-eric
___
Python-Dev
15.12.17 20:02, Yury Selivanov пише:
But nobody decorates __new__ with a @staticmethod. And making
__class_getitem__ a @classmethod will only confuse users -- that's all
I'm saying.
So I'm +1 to keep the things exactly as they are now. It would be
great do document that in order to implement
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.12.17 18:47, Yury Selivanov пише:
>>
>> Shouldn't we optimize the usability for pure-Python first, and then for C
>> API?
>>
>> Right now we have the '__new__' magic method, which isn't a
>> @classmethod. Making
15.12.17 18:47, Yury Selivanov пише:
Shouldn't we optimize the usability for pure-Python first, and then for C API?
Right now we have the '__new__' magic method, which isn't a
@classmethod. Making '__class_getitem__' a @classmethod will confuse
regular Python users. For example:
class
On 15 December 2017 at 17:47, Yury Selivanov
wrote:
> Shouldn't we optimize the usability for pure-Python first, and then for C
> API?
>
> Right now we have the '__new__' magic method, which isn't a
> @classmethod. Making '__class_getitem__' a @classmethod will confuse
Shouldn't we optimize the usability for pure-Python first, and then for C API?
Right now we have the '__new__' magic method, which isn't a
@classmethod. Making '__class_getitem__' a @classmethod will confuse
regular Python users. For example:
class Foo:
def __new__(cls, ...): pass
I like this idea. I have few suggestions for the test cases you added, will
add them a bit later in the PR.
--
Ivan
On 15 December 2017 at 16:00, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> The class itself always is passed as the first argument to
> __class_getitem__():
>
>