On Dec 24, 2012 11:44 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:42 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
What should I do in case Eric lost interest after his GSoC project for
PSF
appeared as useless for python-dev community? Should I rewrite the
proposal
What should I do in case Eric lost interest after his GSoC project for PSF
appeared as useless for python-dev community? Should I rewrite the proposal
from scratch?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
You cannot rewrite an existing PEP if you are not one of
Hey,
Anatoly, you are free to modify the PEP and code. I do not have any
plans to work on this right now.
Eric
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:42:20PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
What should I do in case Eric lost interest after his GSoC project for PSF
appeared as useless for python-dev
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:42 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
What should I do in case Eric lost interest after his GSoC project for PSF
appeared as useless for python-dev community? Should I rewrite the proposal
from scratch?
Before you attempt that, start by trying to have a
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon
Please stop copying me on this thread.
Thanks,
Jean-Paul
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't disagree that he shouldn't have cross-posted. I was just
pointing out that the language should be clarified. What's confusing
is
On Dec 19, 2012, at 7:46 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On *nix it really shouldn't be select. select cannot wait upon a file
descriptor whose value is greater than FD_SETSIZE, which means it sets a
hard (and small) limit on the number of things that a process which
You cannot rewrite an existing PEP if you are not one of the original
owners, nor can you add yourself as an author to a PEP without permission
from the original authors.
And please do not CC the peps mailing list on discussions. It should only
be used to mail in new PEPs or acceptable patches to
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
And please do not CC the peps mailing list on discussions. It should only be
used to mail in new PEPs or acceptable patches to PEPs.
PEP 1 should perhaps be clarified if the above is the case.
Currently, PEP 1 says all
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
And please do not CC the peps mailing list on discussions. It should
only be
used to mail in new PEPs or acceptable patches to PEPs.
PEP
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
And please do not CC the peps mailing list on discussions. It should
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:10 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
What about reading from other file descriptors? subprocess.Popen allows
arbitrary file descriptors to be used. Is there any provision here for
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
I'm really not sure what this PEP is trying to get at given that it
contains no examples and sounds from the descriptions to be adding a
complicated api on top of something that already, IMNSHO, has too much it
On Dec 19, 2012, at 2:14 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:10 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
What about reading from other file descriptors? subprocess.Popen allows
Please stop copying me on this thread.
Thanks,
Jean-Paul
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Dec 19, 2012, at 2:14 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:10 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:10 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
What about reading from other file descriptors? subprocess.Popen allows
arbitrary file descriptors to be used. Is there any provision here for
reading and writing non-blocking from or to those?
On Windows it is
I'm really not sure what this PEP is trying to get at given that it
contains no examples and sounds from the descriptions to be adding a
complicated api on top of something that already, IMNSHO, has too much it
(subprocess.Popen).
Regardless, any user can use the stdout/err/in file objects with
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Glyph gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:10 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
What about reading from other file descriptors? subprocess.Popen allows
arbitrary file descriptors to be used. Is there any provision here for
On Dec 8, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
Is twisted's spawnProcess thread safe and async signal safe by using
restricted C code for everything between the fork() and exec()? I'm not
familiar enough with the twisted codebase to find things easily in it but I'm
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 04:25 pm, eric.pru...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm bumping this PEP again in hopes of getting some feedback.
This is useful, indeed. ActiveState recipe for this has 10 votes, which is
high for ActiveState (and such hardcore topic
I'm bumping this PEP again in hopes of getting some feedback.
Thanks,
Eric
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 23:52, Eric Pruitt eric.pru...@gmail.com wrote:
PEP: 3145
Title: Asynchronous I/O For subprocess.Popen
Author: (James) Eric Pruitt, Charles R. McCreary, Josiah Carlson
Type: Standards Track
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:25:35PM -0400, Eric Pruitt wrote:
A search for python asynchronous subprocess will turn up numerous
accounts of people
IMHO there is no need to refer to a search. It'd be enough to say There
are many people
kernel 32 DLL
Why not just name it kernel32.dll?
Hello,
I would like to know if your approach is based on Python 2.x or 3.x.
Python 3.x has new API provisions, in the I/O layer, for non-blocking I/O
and it would be nice if your work could fit in that framework.
Popen can be made to act like a file by simply
using the methods
25 matches
Mail list logo
