Brett Cannon schrieb:
* AtheOS
* BeOS
In both cases, the last maintainer should be contacted before the
platform is unsupported.
I guess I can go off the emails listed in README and Misc/BeOS-NOTES,
although I would hope that any maintainer would watch python-dev in
Brett Cannon schrieb:
I originally posted this list to python-3000 since I figured we could
be more aggressive with Py3K, but Guido said I should move it over
here and just be aggressive in 2.6.
Please follow PEP 11 in doing so. This means you cannot remove the code
in Python 2.6, only break
On 12/29/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon schrieb:
I originally posted this list to python-3000 since I figured we could
be more aggressive with Py3K, but Guido said I should move it over
here and just be aggressive in 2.6.
Please follow PEP 11 in doing so. This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett So, here are the platforms I figured we should drop:
...
Brett * OS/2
I'm pretty sure Andrew MacIntyre is still maintaining the OS/2+EMX port:
http://members.pcug.org.au/~andymac/python.html
I am, although I haven't managed a binary
On 12/23/06, Andrew MacIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, if the project management decide that even the EMX support
should be removed from the official tree - so be it; I will just have
to maintain the port outside the official tree.
I don't think that's the objective. In general we
On Sunday 24 December 2006 00:19, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
Of course, if the project management decide that even the EMX
support should be removed from the official tree - so be it; I
will just have to maintain the port outside the official tree.
I feel that so long as there's an active
Brett So, here are the platforms I figured we should drop:
...
Brett * OS/2
I'm pretty sure Andrew MacIntyre is still maintaining the OS/2+EMX port:
http://members.pcug.org.au/~andymac/python.html
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
