Christian Heimes wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> I do think that another (final) 3.0 alpha before PyCon would also be a
>> good idea. This way we can gel the release some more. For 2.6 I think
>> we'll need more alpha releases after PyCon; I doubt the backporting
>> from 3.0 (which has onl
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Yes, I will. What are your time-lines? I've been targeting first week
> in March.
I like to port bytearray to 2.6 as early as possible. I'd be grateful if
you could port a limited subset of the new buffer protocol within the
next few weeks. bytearray needs:
PyBuffer
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I do think that another (final) 3.0 alpha before PyCon would also be a
> good idea. This way we can gel the release some more. For 2.6 I think
> we'll need more alpha releases after PyCon; I doubt the backporting
> from 3.0 (which has only started seriously quite recently)
On Jan 28, 2008 10:50 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the current thinking on this? Is the target still April 2008 as
> mentioned in PEP361? Are we going to have an alpha sometime soonish?
I would like to have an alpha before PyCon. It looks like there are
two release