On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 20:06 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There's also a list for Python-3000-related checkins. Don't subscribe
> to that one yet, it's very boring and uninteresting. Also, Barry
> hasn't done the svn magic yet. :-)
We're having a small problem on the svn box which requires Tho
The Python 3000 mailing list has been created. From now on let's have
all discussions related to Python 3000 on that list. Please subscribe
here:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Let's start by attempting to answer the process questions: timeline;
upgrade path; library reform
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
>>
>> And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
>
> Subscription requests have be
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> respond with a +1
> or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list.
+1
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--+
University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! |
Christchurch, New Zealand |
On 3/20/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
> >
> > And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
>
>
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
>
> And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
Subscription requests have been made.
-Barry
signature.asc
De
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
Terry
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org
On 3/20/06, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -0 on separate mailing list and PEP numbers.
You seem to be the minority so far...
> Because to much separation between python 2.x and python 3.x makes 3.x
> seem more like vaporware that will never happen (Perl 6).
I'm actually trying to
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 19:27 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> +1 on the separate mailing list (and PEP numbers).
I'm neutral on whether a new mailing list should be added, but +1 on
separate PEP numbers.
> If Barry (or another mailing list admin) is feeling energetic, some
> branch-specific topics o
On 3/20/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of themis worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll startdiscussing the issues there -- or here,
On 20/03/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on the separate mailing list (and PEP numbers).If Barry (or another mailing list admin) is feeling energetic, somebranch-specific topics on python-checkins would be nice, too. While I'minterested in tracking trunk checkins, I'm not so concerne
> Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
> is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
> or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll start
> discussing the issues there -- or here, if the general sense is not to
> split the li
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I see increased activity related to Python 3000. This is great, but
> there is some danger involved. Some of the dangers are: overloading
> developers; setting unrealistic expectations for what can be
> accomplished; scaring the more conservative user community; paralyzing
On 3/19/06, Christian Tismer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> ...
>
> > Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
> > is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
> > or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'
Guido van Rossum wrote:
...
> Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
> is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
> or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll start
> discussing the issues there -- or here, if the general s
15 matches
Mail list logo
