On 15 June 2014 14:57, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On 06/14/2014 09:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply
Le 15 juin 2014 02:42, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays, and to explicitly raise a
(more helpful)
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
On 15 June 2014 14:57, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On 06/14/2014 09:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com writes:
Le 15 juin 2014 02:42, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays, and to explicitly raise a
(more helpful) TypeError if anything else is passed in.
That seems reasonable. I don't think
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays, and to explicitly raise a
(more helpful) TypeError if
On 06/14/2014 09:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays, and to
