Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> On 2/24/08, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Let's only do it for -O; the optimization may interfere with debugging the
>> code.
>
>
> Does anyone ever actually bother to use -O?
People may start bothering to use -O when it's giving them a speedup for
real
On 2/24/08, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's only do it for -O; the optimization may interfere with debugging the
> code.
Does anyone ever actually bother to use -O?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Short description (see http://
Let's only do it for -O; the optimization may interfere with debugging the code.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short description (see http://bugs.python.org/issue2181 for the patch
> and more details):
>
> Optimize code like:
>x = any_expression
>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short description (see http://bugs.python.org/issue2181 for the patch
> and more details):
>
> Optimize code like:
>x = any_expression
>return x
>
> to:
>return any_expression
>
> The local variable x is no l
