Memories of days past... Python had several regular expression
implementations before, one of which was called "regex".
But I would rather not have a new module -- I would much rather have a
flag specifying the new (backwards incompatible) syntax/semantics. The
flag would have a long name (e.g. re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 14:10, MRAB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
> opinion on a number of matters:
>
> Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
> zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour s
MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by default in case any ex
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/12/2010 5:10 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour sh
On 1/12/2010 5:10 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by