On Fri, Mar 18, 2005, Simon Brunning wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:01:03 +, Gareth McCaughan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.sdmagazine.com/jolts/ ,
>>
>> but it's not been updated yet and therefore still has last year's
>> winners on it. I haven't found anything with more
[Nick Coghlan]
-
sum() semantics discussed
-
Guido's blog entry on `the fate of reduce() in Python 3000`_ (which
reiterated Guido's plan to cut map(), reduce(), filter() and lambdas (what
about zip()?) caused a huge discussion on whether sum() worke
[Paul Moore]
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:21:33 -0800, Brett C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2.4.1 should be out soon
Python 2.4.1c1 is out. Very shortly c2 will be released. Assuming no major
issues come up, 2.4 final will be out.
You probably mean somet
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That last sentence isn't quite true. With an appropriate second
> argument, sum can be used to sum any sequence (even one containing
> strings):
>
> Py> class additive_identity(object):
> ... def __add__(self, other):
> ... return other
> ...
==> s
I'm hoping to get the bdist_deb patch committed this week. This is SF
patch 1054967:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1054967&group_id=5470&atid=305470
Does anyone have any feedback on this before I do so? I'm imagining
committing it into the Python CVS, but as my f
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:55:09PM -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2005 17:44, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> > Additionally, there are several patches on SF that pertain to
> > webbrowser.py; perhaps you can review some of them...
>
> Given the time I haven't been able to de
Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have any feedback on this before I do so?
I made a few comments on the Tracker.
--
KBK
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Un
Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is fairly abusive of sum, though :)
[snip Kurt's timings]
Even avoiding the object instantiation doesn't help much:
Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" o
Hi My name is Juan Carlos Rodrigo, and I love Python.
It is the most impressive and usefull language that
I have ever seen.
I am studing, at http://www.uoc.edu, an Information
Technology Postgraduate. And I have programmed some
REXX applications in my past Jobs (So I love python,
no more ENDS
Juan Carlos Rodrigo Garcia wrote:
It is easier if we see it beforehand:
-
leave = False
alist = [1,2,3,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
for item in alist and not leave:
if item is 1: leave = True
Interesting idea, but not really needed given the existence of the break
statemen
Juan Carlos Rodrigo wrote:
Interesting idea, but not really needed given the existence of the break statement:
Goto = break
I'm not interested.
All non-sequential control structures are merely constrained ways of using goto
(the underlying machine code will devolve into conditional and unconditio
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005, Juan Carlos Rodrigo Garcia wrote:
>
> Hi My name is Juan Carlos Rodrigo, and I love Python. It is the most
> impressive and usefull language that I have ever seen.
Glad to hear that! However, your post is off-topic for python-dev;
you'll have a better discussion posting to
12 matches
Mail list logo
