[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've uploaded a new package to the new PyPI. Editing this
new packages gives me a unicode error. The URL is
http://www.python.org/pypi?:action=submit_form&name=ll-ansistyle&version=0.6.1
I see that the package is online now, so
hello,
I would welcome any help regarding:
-how can I get/give more info on what's happening?
-how to solve that stuff?
thanks a lot in advance.
here is the problem:
I have a python (actually pythondotnet) process freezing on windows,
like that:
Thread Start Address:
>Symbol Name:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:13:56 +0100, Stan Pinte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would welcome any help regarding:
>
> -how can I get/give more info on what's happening?
> -how to solve that stuff?
>
> thanks a lot in advance.
>
> here is the problem:
>
> I have a python (actually pythondotnet) pr
Hello!
While I'm working on webbrowser... Why do all graphical browsers are
called with their stdout/stderr redirected to /dev/null? Do we really
need to hide problems from the user? Browsers are usually silent beasts
- they interact with the user using windows, not stdio.
(Text-mode browser
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:40:20 +0300
Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
>While I'm working on webbrowser...
Great.
> Why do all graphical browsers are called with their stdout/stderr redirected
> to /dev/null?
Under some linux distros (I'm positive for some Mdk releases),
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:25:12AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
> > Why do all graphical browsers are called with their stdout/stderr
> > redirected
> > to /dev/null?
>
> Under some linux distros (I'm positive for some Mdk releases), Mozilla is
> compiled dumping a lot of info to std
[Rod Senra]:
> > Under some linux distros (I'm positive for some Mdk releases), Mozilla is
> > compiled dumping a lot of info to stdout/stderr. Since one of the goals of
> > webbrowser is to give the end-user a stress-free experience, there goes the
> > mentioned nullification .
[Oleg Broytmann]:
Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /, and %
should be good enough for ya? It runs counter to TOOWTDI, I be thinking.
Arr.
H. Toothrot
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today -
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:59:24AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
> Has this same issue been dealt in another stdlib module ?
pydoc.py:
rc = os.system('netscape -remote "openURL(%s)" &' % url)
if rc: os.system('netscape "%s" &' % url)
PS. This, of course, should must be fixed - pyd
Oops...
> PS. This, of course, should must be fixed - pydoc must use webbrowser.py!
^^ delete (-:
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
__
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005, Herman Toothrot wrote:
>
> Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /, and %
> should be good enough for ya? It runs counter to TOOWTDI, I be thinking.
> Arr.
This is off-topic for python-dev. Please post to comp.lang.python
instead.
--
Aahz ([EM
Herman Toothrot wrote:
Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /, and
% should be good enough for ya? It runs counter to TOOWTDI, I be
thinking. Arr.
Well, divmod(x, y) does both / and % in one shot, which can be very
useful. pow(x, y[, z]) has an optional third argume
Hey folks,
I'm sitting over here in the AppleScript talk and Jacob is explaining a
module called 'appscript' that interfaces to the Apple Events system.
What caught my eye was this example:
from appscript import *
ab = app('Address Book')
people = ab.people.filter(its.emails != [])
For filter and map, list comprehensions and generator expressions are
the answer.
>>> numbers = [5, 9, 56, 34, 1, 24, 37, 89]
>>> [x for x in numbers if x < 30]
[5, 9, 1, 24]
>>> (x for x in numbers if x < 30)
>>> list(_)
[5, 9, 1, 24]
Jeremy
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:33:53 -0600 (CST), Ka-Ping Ye
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:33:53 -0600 (CST), Ka-Ping Yee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It dawned on me that you could use this idea to make the whole
> filter/lambda experience vastly more pleasant. I whipped up a quick
> implementation:
>
> >>> from placeholder import _
> >>> numbers = [5, 9
"Herman Toothrot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /, and %
> should be good enough for ya? It runs counter to TOOWTDI, I be thinking.
Questions like this should be asked on comp.lang.python or the py
Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:33:53 -0600 (CST), Ka-Ping Yee
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It dawned on me that you could use this idea to make the whole
> > filter/lambda experience vastly more pleasant. I whipped up a quick
> > implementation:
> >
> >
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Josiah Carlson wrote:
> Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought about it, but couldn't convince myself that it would work
> > properly in all cases. I was thinking in terms of operator overloading
> > of everything possible - how did you do it?
>
> PyTables allows s
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> It dawned on me that you could use this idea to make the whole
> filter/lambda experience vastly more pleasant. I whipped up a quick
> implementation:
>
> >>> from placeholder import _
> >>> numbers = [5, 9, 56, 34, 1, 24, 37, 89]
> >>> filter(_ < 30, numbers)
>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> What does you implementation do for this:
>
> >>> somevar = False
> >>> filter(_ and False, numbers)
It fails. (For the same reason that __len__ doesn't work --
Python insists that __nonzero__ must return an int.) Though
i must say i have no idea
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:28:42PM +0300, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:40:27AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Perhaps you could focus in 728278. It addresses some of the issues you
> > have addressed in 754022, but it is not properly formatted. If you could
> > merge into
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
What does you implementation do for this:
somevar = False
filter(_ and False, numbers)
It fails. (For the same reason that __len__ doesn't work --
Python insists that __nonzero__ must return an int.) T
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:34:09 -0500, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Herman Toothrot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /, and %
> > should be good enough for ya? It runs counter to TOOWTDI
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
>> What does you implementation do for this:
>>
>> >>> somevar = False
>> >>> filter(_ and False, numbers)
>
> It fails. (For the same reason that __len__ doesn't work --
> Python insists that __nonzero__ must return an int.) T
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:29:30 +0300
Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggested resolutions:
> http://python.org/sf/754022
>Review and apply! ;)
Reviewed.
Thank you Oleg, fine integration job.
I added a +1 comment to the tracker and copied
your remaining obs to 754022 history.
So a
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
> However, there are two other issues:
> 1) If a *graphical* application dumps messages to the console,
>that might be disruptive to other console applications.
>IMVHO, a log file should be used instead. (strong argument)
Perhaps instead webbrowser.py sho
Ka-Ping Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Josiah Carlson wrote:
> > Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I thought about it, but couldn't convince myself that it would work
> > > properly in all cases. I was thinking in terms of operator overloading
> > > of everythin
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:59:29 -0500, Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:34:09 -0500, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Herman Toothrot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Avast! Why be there builtins divmod and pow, when operators **, /,
a
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:58:51 +0100, Florian Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, Herman Toothrot is from Monkey Island.
Right. That's what leads me to believe 1) it's not a serious post,
and 2) it's from someone who's old enough to know better.
--
Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 07:40, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
>While I'm working on webbrowser... Why do all graphical browsers are
> called with their stdout/stderr redirected to /dev/null? Do we really
> need to hide problems from the user? Browsers are usually silent beasts
> - they interact w
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 08:25, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
> Under some linux distros (I'm positive for some Mdk releases), Mozilla is
> compiled dumping a lot of info to stdout/stderr. Since one of the goals of
> webbrowser is to give the end-user a stress-free experience, there goes
>
On 23 March 2005, Oleg Broytmann said:
>I'd like to remove all those redirects. Any opinion?
+0.5. The beauty of Python is that it generally provides thin
wrappers: when writing a convenient wrapper, it's OK to expose the
underlying beast, warts and all.
(I had a minor epiphany about this re
Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:58:51 +0100, Florian Schulze
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, Herman Toothrot is from Monkey Island.
>
> Right. That's what leads me to believe 1) it's not a serious post,
> and 2) it's from someone who's old enough to know b
Hi people,
If this is not the correct place to post this problem, I apologize. In
that case, please be gentle and point me to a better mailing list.
I'm coding a text editor in Qt that uses Python for macros. The problem I
have is that want to use the bool type introduced in 2.3, but I can't se
Oops, you're right.
What I should have said is to use a blank docstring as
follows:
""
"""Function docstring."""
def foo:
...
or:
"""Module docstring."""
""
def foo:
...
--- Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2005 20:08, Nicholas Jacobson
> wrote:
>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 06:20:44PM -0500, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
>Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does anyone have any feedback on this before I do so?
>
>I made a few comments on the Tracker.
Thanks a lot, they look great. I'll try to get the submitter to follow up
on it.
Sean
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 05:58, Nicholas Jacobson wrote:
> Oops, you're right.
>
> What I should have said is to use a blank docstring as
> follows:
It's still unclear to me what a file containing a single docstring
followed by a def() line means. And this ambiguity doesn't seem
to be solvable, so
"Bo Thorsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If this is not the correct place to post this problem, I apologize. In
> that case, please be gentle and point me to a better mailing list.
The general Python mailing list (pyrhon-list ?) also at python.org. Or
comp.lan
38 matches
Mail list logo
