On 11/26/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i found several places in my code where i use positive infinity
> (posinf) for various things, i.e.,
>
>
> i like the concept, but i hate the "1e1" stuff... why not add
> posint, neginf, and nan to the float type? i find it much more readab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phillip J. Eby napsal(a):
> Just a suggestion, but one issue that I think needs addressing is the FHS
> language that leads some Linux distros to believe that they should change
> Python's normal installation layout (sometimes in bizarre ways) (...)
>
At 02:38 PM 11/27/2006 +0100, Jan Matejek wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Phillip J. Eby napsal(a):
> > Just a suggestion, but one issue that I think needs addressing is the FHS
> > language that leads some Linux distros to believe that they should change
> > Python's norm
Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> > Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> >> I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
> >> of CPython;
> >
> > Is there a 'do not' missing somewhere in there?
>
> No - I really mean it. I ca
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. L?wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>>> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
I personally consider it "good style" to rely on implementation details
of CPython;
>>>
>>> Is there a 'do not' missin
On 11/27/06, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> > Way back on 11/22/06, "Martin v. L?wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [...] I can find nothing wrong with people relying on
> >> reference counting to close files, for example. It's a property of
> >>
Version 0.10 of the 'processing' package is available at the cheeseshop:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/processing
It is intended to make writing programs using processes almost the
same as writing
programs using threads. (By importing from 'processing.dummy' instead
of 'processing'
one can use
Talin schrieb:
> As far as rewriting it goes - I can only rewrite things that I understand.
So if you want this to change, you obviously need to understand the
entire distutils. It's possible to do that; some people have done
it (the "understanding" part) - just go ahead and start reading source
c
Phillip J. Eby schrieb:
> Actually, I meant that (among other things) it should be clarified that
> it's alright to e.g. put .pyc and data files inside Python library
> directories, and NOT okay to split them up.
My gut feeling is that this is out of scope for the LSB. The LSB would
only specify
Jan Matejek schrieb:
> +1 on that. There should be a clear (and clearly presented) idea of how
> Python is supposed to be laid out in the distribution-provided /usr
> hierarchy. And it would be nice if this idea complied to FHS.
The LSB refers to the FHS, so it is clear that LSB support for Python
On 11/27/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talin schrieb:
> > As far as rewriting it goes - I can only rewrite things that I understand.
>
> So if you want this to change, you obviously need to understand the
> entire distutils. It's possible to do that; some people have done
> it
Mike Orr wrote:
> On 11/27/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Talin schrieb:
>>> As far as rewriting it goes - I can only rewrite things that I understand.
>> So if you want this to change, you obviously need to understand the
>> entire distutils. It's possible to do that; some peo
12 matches
Mail list logo
